Socioeconomics Is the Operating System of Modern Eugenics

In the United States, eugenics is not a relic of the past — it is a living doctrine embedded in current economic and institutional structures. The false belief in genetic superiority continues to animate policy decisions, public health strategies, and economic exclusion, particularly when it comes to Black, Indigenous, disabled, immigrant, and poor communities.

Today, socioeconomics is the delivery system through which eugenic ideology is applied. The language may have changed, but the function remains: control reproduction, restrict opportunity, and justify exclusion by turning state violence into statistical “disparity.”

Eugenics Never Died. It Rebranded.

Eugenics has always claimed that certain people — especially those who are wealthy, white, non-disabled, and educated — possess inherently superior traits. That belief continues to guide public policy, disguised by coded language like:

“At-risk populations”
“Cycles of poverty”
“Disproportionality”
“Welfare dependency”
“Achievement gaps”

Each of these phrases is a linguistic loophole — one that obscures the fact that what is being described are the consequences of targeted disinvestment, systemic theft, and organized neglect.

Poverty Is Not an Inheritance — It’s a Program

In the current system, poverty is treated not as the result of decades of theft, exclusion, and exploitation, but as a biological or cultural defect. This view aligns perfectly with the eugenic framework: that some people are just naturally less capable, less productive, or less worthy of protection.

Government agencies, school systems, hospitals, and courts still behave as if poverty and vulnerability are indicators of genetic unfitness. This is especially clear in practices like:

Child removals from poor Black families under the guise of “neglect”
Involuntary sterilization of incarcerated women
Punitive work requirements for welfare that don’t apply to corporations receiving state subsidies
Disability benefits being denied based on bureaucratic “fitness” assessments

These are not oversights. These are strategies of population control.

Socioeconomic Policy Is Eugenics in Practice

State and federal agencies still operate on the belief that some lives are too expensive to maintain — or too dangerous to allow to multiply. As a result, public resources are hoarded and policed, not shared or repaired. Consider:

Healthcare deserts in poor communities
School closures and “failing school” designations
Surveillance-based welfare systems
Policing replacing mental health services
Medicaid restrictions tied to work or sterilization
Underfunding of maternal health care in Black communities

None of these are neutral economic outcomes. They are designed outcomes — and they align with a worldview that sees some lives as burdens and others as investments.

Language of “Disparity” Is Language of Denial

The word “disparity” is itself a strategic deception. It allows institutions to speak about violence without naming it. It is used to cover up criminal activity — specifically, violations of policy, regulation, and law — by reducing targeted harm to neutral-sounding inequality.

But there is no legal category of “disparity.” There are only:

Violations of constitutional protections
Violations of federal anti-discrimination law
Violations of agency-specific policies
Violations of labor law, contract law, and civil rights statutes

Where "disparities" exist, so do failures of enforcement — and failures of enforcement are themselves violations.

Eugenics Is a Supply Chain

This system is not chaotic. It is a supply chain of organized harm:

The state creates the condition (poverty, exclusion, trauma)
Agencies profit from studying, managing, and blaming that condition
Institutions use euphemisms like "disparity" to describe the resulting suffering
Funds are acquired to “address” the problem — but rarely reach those directly impacted
The public is misled into funding agencies that actually caused the harm
The media and academia reproduce the lie, reinforcing the illusion that these are unfortunate differences, not deliberate policies

This cycle is eugenic in structure. It categorizes, targets, extracts, blames, and sterilizes — sometimes metaphorically, sometimes literally.

Eliminate the Loophole. Tell the Truth.

Where you hear the word “disparity,” replace it with:

Violation
Neglect
Fraud
Theft
Reproductive violence
Racial targeting
Policy failure
Enforcement failure

Public institutions are not allowed to operate without policy, regulation, or law. Therefore, when specific harms occur, they are not accidental. They are violations — and those with the authority to act who fail to do so are accessories to those violations.

The Power of Naming Names

Eugenics survives because it hides in generalities. The public can disrupt it by telling the truth with specificity:

Name the act
Name the violator
Name the agency responsible
Name the policy or law that was broken
Name the consequence for violation
Name who failed to enforce that consequence

This is how the system is dismantled — not through abstraction, but through specific, documented exposure. Disparity is the fog. The truth cuts through it.

Pages